Midterm Question 3 Response - Brooke Cambra
3. Choose a problem of acute poverty in your country and
describe a global social work intervention you could create (assume you have
plenty of resources) to remedy that problem. Briefly summarize the
poverty-correcting intervention and then describe how you would apply it.
I want to address homelessness and housing insecurity in the US using
the Capability Approach. To begin, it is important to address the
sociopolitical history of the United States' institutional and systematic
racism, economic inequality, and changes in the Welfare State due to politics
and postindustrial capitalism that has resulted in the current homelessness
crisis our country is experiencing. However, it is incredibly difficult and
time consuming to start by addressing the root problem of capitalism and
conservative political agendas, and people need help now. The homelessness
crisis did not come out of nowhere and it does not impact communities equally.
Institutional and systematic racism has impacted Black and Brown communities
the hardest and people in these communities that experience homelessness for
different reasons and experience different and more systemic barriers than
their White counterparts. Poverty and generational poverty must be viewed
through a historical lens to recognize the major impact racism has had on its
perpetuation. The degradation of the Welfare State and the devaluation of all
welfare programs have increased the impact of poverty because people are even
less supported by their government for basic human needs, and they are definitely
not being supported to achieve freedom. The Capability Approach links
capability to valuable functioning, agency, and freedom. To be capable, one
must be able to have the freedom to choose which functioning they can achieve.
They also must have agency, meaning they can bring about personal change and
have their own values and purpose (Onwuegbuchulam, 2018).
I recognize that homeless and housing insecure individuals meet the
absolute definition of poverty, but our goal should not be to just provide
housing and nutrition. I am defining poverty relatively and will use that to
frame the purpose and goals of the anti-homeless program I am proposing.
Because poverty is relative to the living conditions and standards of the
country, my program will assist people to achieve a moderate standard of living
of the average non-impoverished American (Seipel, 2003). In order to empower
participants of the program to be autonomous individuals with agency, we will
ask each individual about their needs and what type of assistance they need and
want from the benefits of the program. I want participants to be able to choose
what type of assistance they want and be able to accommodate their specific
needs. We must listen to their needs because their input is valuable because of
their personal experience with abject poverty and homelessness. However, I do
believe that participants deemed unfit to advocate for themselves due severe
mental health disorders (including Substance Abuse Disorder) will be provided a
caseworker that will act in accordance to their needs.
My Anti-Homeless Program will utilize the poverty reduction strategies
discussed in "Global poverty: No longer an untouchable problem" such
as social investment, growth with equity, education, health, and job creation
(Seipel, 2003). We will provide housing and health and mental health treatment,
which included substance abuse treatment. Begin with providing basic individual
housing (not shared rooms shelter style) to give individuals privacy and
autonomy over their space. After couch surfing, living in shelters, or sleeping
rough on the street, people should be provided with their right to privacy and
autonomy that has been denied to them. While illicit substances should not be
technically "allowed" in these housing buildings, residents should never
be kicked out if drugs are found. They can be confiscated, but it is imperative
that substance abuse treatment is offered and strongly encouraged through
positive incentives and not through negative punishments. Participants will be
given the option of being provided with food cafeteria style or with SNAP so
that they can do their own grocery shopping and cooking. Participants should
also be given a basic income for toiletries,
clothing, and personal items. Education and job training should be
offered to prepare participants for entering or re-entering the work force to
give them agency over their own lives instead of dictating what they are
allowed to do. However, this should not be forced on participants, especially
not right away. They should be encouraged to heal, reset, and adjust or
readjust to their new, stable environment. It is important to remember that
experiencing homelessness is extremely stressful and traumatic, and results in
significantly negative impacts on their psychological and social responses.
Education and job training should only be provided at the request of the
participant or after they are deemed psychologically and physically fit enough
for this change. Education and training is imperative to increase human capital
Assistance with finding jobs should be provided, with certain jobs being
offered through the program. Despite my personal beliefs that capitalism is the
root problem of poverty and inequality, we must work within the capitalist
system we live in and work with it while also working against it by increasing
social wellbeing and equality. It is difficult for people to acquire jobs after
being unemployed for a while or because of lack of experience. So, the program
should work with specific companies and businesses that are willing to hire our
participants and most importantly, they understand the unique backgrounds of
their employees and ensure they are understanding and patient with them during
this huge life change. We can also ensure that our participants are being
fairly paid, given adequate hours to work, and we can advocate for our
participants if they have problems or concerns. All money earned through
working cannot be monitored or withheld from any participant unless at their
request. We will work with a bank or a credit union that they can save the
money they are provided and the money they earned through working. Help with
their finances and connections with financial advisors should be provided upon
request. This is how we engage in social investment without dehumanizing and
taking away individual freedom and agency (Seipel, 2003).
References
Onwuegbuchulam, S. P. (2018). A
capability approach assessment of poverty in the sociopolitical history of
South Africa/kwazulu-natal. Journal of Poverty, 22(4), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2017.1419529
Seipel, M. M. O. (2003). Global poverty.
International Social Work, 46(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872803046002005
Comments
Post a Comment